# Applying Gauss’s Law

#### LEARNING OBJECTIVES

By the end of this section, you will be able to:

- Explain what spherical, cylindrical, and planar symmetry are
- Recognize whether or not a given system possesses one of these symmetries
- Apply Gauss’s law to determine the electric field of a system with one of these symmetries

Gauss’s law is very helpful in determining expressions for the electric field, even though the law is not directly about the electric field; it is about the electric flux. It turns out that in situations that have certain symmetries (spherical, cylindrical, or planar) in the charge distribution, we can deduce the electric field based on knowledge of the electric flux. In these systems, we can find a Gaussian surface

over which the electric field has constant magnitude. Furthermore, if

is parallel to

everywhere on the surface, then

. (If

and

are antiparallel everywhere on the surface, then

.) Gauss’s law then simplifies to

(2.3.1)

where

is the area of the surface. Note that these symmetries lead to the transformation of the flux integral into a product of the magnitude of the electric field and an appropriate area. When you use this flux in the expression for Gauss’s law, you obtain an algebraic equation that you can solve for the magnitude of the electric field, which looks like

The direction of the electric field at the field point

is obtained from the symmetry of the charge distribution and the type of charge in the distribution. Therefore, Gauss’s law can be used to determine

. Here is a summary of the steps we will follow:

#### Problem-Solving Strategy: Gauss’s Law

*Identify the spatial symmetry of the charge distribution*. This is an important first step that allows us to choose the appropriate Gaussian surface. As examples, an isolated point charge has spherical symmetry, and an infinite line of charge has cylindrical symmetry.*Choose a Gaussian surface with the same symmetry as the charge distribution and identify its consequences*. With this choice, is easily determined over the Gaussian surface.*Evaluate the integral*\oint_S\vec{\mathbf{E}}\cdot\hat{\mathbf{n}}dA*over the Gaussian surface, that is, calculate the flux through the surface*. The symmetry of the Gaussian surface allows us to factor outside the integral.*Determine the amount of charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface*. This is an evaluation of the right-hand side of the equation representing Gauss’s law. It is often necessary to perform an integration to obtain the net enclosed charge.*Evaluate the electric field of the charge distribution*. The field may now be found using the results of steps 3 and 4.

Basically, there are only three types of symmetry that allow Gauss’s law to be used to deduce the electric field. They are

- A charge distribution with spherical symmetry
- A charge distribution with cylindrical symmetry
- A charge distribution with planar symmetry

To exploit the symmetry, we perform the calculations in appropriate coordinate systems and use the right kind of Gaussian surface for that symmetry, applying the remaining four steps.

#### Charge Distribution with Spherical Symmetry

A charge distribution has **spherical symmetry** if the density of charge depends only on the distance from a point in space and not on the direction. In other words, if you rotate the system, it doesn’t look different. For instance, if a sphere of radius

is uniformly charged with charge density

then the distribution has spherical symmetry (Figure 2.3.1(a)). On the other hand, if a sphere of radius

is charged so that the top half of the sphere has uniform charge density

and the bottom half has a uniform charge density

, then the sphere does not have spherical symmetry because the charge density depends on the direction (Figure 2.3.1(b)). Thus, it is not the shape of the object but rather the shape of the charge distribution that determines whether or not a system has spherical symmetry.

Figure 2.3.1(c) shows a sphere with four different shells, each with its own uniform charge density. Although this is a situation where charge density in the full sphere is not uniform, the charge density function depends only on the distance from the centre and not on the direction. Therefore, this charge distribution does have spherical symmetry.

(Figure 2.3.1)

**Figure 2.3.1**Illustrations of spherically symmetrical and nonsymmetrical systems. Different shadings indicate different charge densities. Charges on spherically shaped objects do not necessarily mean the charges are distributed with spherical symmetry. The spherical symmetry occurs only when the charge density does not depend on the direction. In (a), charges are distributed uniformly in a sphere. In (b), the upper half of the sphere has a different charge density from the lower half; therefore, (b) does not have spherical symmetry. In (c), the charges are in spherical shells of different charge densities, which means that charge density is only a function of the radial distance from the centre; therefore, the system has spherical symmetry.One good way to determine whether or not your problem has spherical symmetry is to look at the charge density function in spherical coordinates,

. If the charge density is only a function of

, that is

, then you have spherical symmetry. If the density depends on

or

you could change it by rotation; hence, you would not have spherical symmetry.

#### Consequences of symmetry

In all spherically symmetrical cases, the electric field at any point must be radially directed, because the charge and, hence, the field must be invariant under rotation. Therefore, using spherical coordinates with their origins at the centre of the spherical charge distribution, we can write down the expected form of the electric field at a point

located at a distance

from the centre:

(2.3.2)

where

is the unit vector pointed in the direction from the origin to the field point

. The radial component

of the electric field can be positive or negative. When

of the charge distribution and the radius of the Gaussian surface are different quantities.

**Figure 2.3.2**The electric field at any point of the spherical Gaussian surface for a spherically symmetrical charge distribution is parallel to the area element vector at that point, giving flux as the product of the magnitude of electric field and the value of the area. Note that the radiusThe magnitude of the electric field

must be the same everywhere on a spherical Gaussian surface concentric with the distribution. For a spherical surface of radius

,

#### Using Gauss’s law

According to Gauss’s law, the flux through a closed surface is equal to the total charge enclosed within the closed surface divided by the permittivity of vacuum

. Let

be the total charge enclosed inside the distance

from the origin, which is the space inside the Gaussian spherical surface of radius

. This gives the following relation for Gauss’s law:

Hence, the electric field at point

that is a distance

from the centre of a spherically symmetrical charge distribution has the following magnitude and direction:

(2.3.3)

Direction: radial from

to

or from

to

.

The direction of the field at point

depends on whether the charge in the sphere is positive or negative. For a net positive charge enclosed within the Gaussian surface, the direction is from

to

, and for a net negative charge, the direction is from

to

. This is all we need for a point charge, and you will notice that the result above is identical to that for a point charge. However, Gauss’s law becomes truly useful in cases where the charge occupies a finite volume.

#### Computing enclosed charge

The more interesting case is when a spherical charge distribution occupies a volume, and asking what the electric field inside the charge distribution is thus becomes relevant. In this case, the charge enclosed depends on the distance

of the field point relative to the radius of the charge distribution

, such as that shown in Figure 2.3.3.

(Figure 2.3.3)

**Figure 2.3.3**A spherically symmetrical charge distribution and the Gaussian surface used for finding the field (a) inside and (b) outside the distribution.If point

is located outside the charge distribution—that is, if

—then the Gaussian surface containing

encloses all charges in the sphere. In this case,

equals the total charge in the sphere. On the other hand, if point

is within the spherical charge distribution, that is, if

is less than the total charge present in the sphere. Referring to Figure 2.3.3, we can write

as

The field at a point outside the charge distribution is also called

, and the field at a point inside the charge distribution is called

. Focusing on the two types of field points, either inside or outside the charge distribution, we can now write the magnitude of the electric field as

(2.3.4)

Note that the electric field outside a spherically symmetrical charge distribution is identical to that of a point charge at the centre that has a charge equal to the total charge of the spherical charge distribution. This is remarkable since the charges are not located at the centre only. We now work out specific examples of spherical charge distributions, starting with the case of a uniformly charged sphere.

#### EXAMPLE 2.3.1

#### Uniformly Charged Sphere

A sphere of radius

, such as that shown in Figure 2.3.3, has a uniform volume charge density

. Find the electric field at a point outside the sphere and at a point inside the sphere.

#### Strategy

Apply the Gauss’s law problem-solving strategy, where we have already worked out the flux calculation.

#### Solution

The charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface is given by

The answer for electric field amplitude can then be written down immediately for a point outside the sphere, labeled

, and a point inside the sphere, labeled

.

It is interesting to note that the magnitude of the electric field increases inside the material as you go out, since the amount of charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface increases with the volume. Specifically, the charge enclosed grows

, whereas the field from each infinitesimal element of charge drops off

with the net result that the electric field within the distribution increases in strength linearly with the radius. The magnitude of the electric field outside the sphere decreases as you go away from the charges, because the included charge remains the same but the distance increases. Figure 2.3.4 displays the variation of the magnitude of the electric field with distance from the centre of a uniformly charged sphere.

(Figure 2.3.4)

. Here, . The electric field is due to a spherical charge distribution of uniform charge density and total charge as a function of distance from the centre of the distribution.

**Figure 2.3.4**Electric field of a uniformly charged, non-conducting sphere increases inside the sphere to a maximum at the surface and then decreases asThe direction of the electric field at any point

is radially outward from the origin if

is positive, and inward (i.e., toward the centre) if

is negative. The electric field at some representative space points are displayed in Figure 2.3.5 whose radial coordinates

are

,

, and

.

(Figure 2.3.5)

**Figure 2.3.5**Electric field vectors inside and outside a uniformly charged sphere.#### Significance

Notice that

has the same form as the equation of the electric field of an isolated point charge. In determining the electric field of a uniform spherical charge distribution, we can therefore assume that all of the charge inside the appropriate spherical Gaussian surface is located at the centre of the distribution.

#### EXAMPLE 2.3.2

#### Non-Uniformly Charged Sphere

A non-conducting sphere of radius

has a non-uniform charge density that varies with the distance from its centre as given by

where

is a constant. We require

so that the charge density is not undefined at

. Find the electric field at a point outside the sphere and at a point inside the sphere.

#### Strategy

Apply the Gauss’s law strategy given above, where we work out the enclosed charge integrals separately for cases inside and outside the sphere.

#### Solution

Since the given charge density function has only a radial dependence and no dependence on direction, we have a spherically symmetrical situation. Therefore, the magnitude of the electric field at any point is given above and the direction is radial. We just need to find the enclosed charge

, which depends on the location of the field point.

A note about symbols: We use

for locating charges in the charge distribution and

for locating the field point(s) at the Gaussian surface(s). The letter

is used for the radius of the charge distribution.

As charge density is not constant here, we need to integrate the charge density function over the volume enclosed by the Gaussian surface. Therefore, we set up the problem for charges in one spherical shell, say between

and

, as shown in Figure 2.3.6. The volume of charges in the shell of infinitesimal width is equal to the product of the area of surface

and the thickness

. Multiplying the volume with the density at this location, which is

, gives the charge in the shell:

(Figure 2.3.6)

is the radius of the charge distribution, is the radius of the Gaussian surface, is the inner radius of the spherical shell, and is the outer radius of the spherical shell. The spherical shell is used to calculate the charge enclosed within the Gaussian surface. The range for is from to for the field at a point inside the charge distribution and from to for the field at a point outside the charge distribution. If

**Figure 2.3.6**Spherical symmetry with non-uniform charge distribution. In this type of problem, we need four radii:*.*

(a) **Field at a point outside the charge distribution.** In this case, the Gaussian surface, which contains the field point

, has a radius

that is greater than the radius

of the charge distribution,

and

is empty of charges and therefore does not contribute to the integral over the volume enclosed by the Gaussian surface:

This is used in the general result for

above to obtain the electric field at a point outside the charge distribution as

where

is a unit vector in the direction from the origin to the field point at the Gaussian surface.

(b) **Field at a point inside the charge distribution.** The Gaussian surface is now buried inside the charge distribution, with

. Therefore, only those charges in the distribution that are within a distance

of the centre of the spherical charge distribution count in

:

Now, using the general result above for

we find the electric field at a point that is a distance

from the centre and lies within the charge distribution as

where the direction information is included by using the unit radial vector.

#### CHECK YOUR UNDERSTANDING 2.4

Check that the electric fields for the sphere reduce to the correct values for a point charge.

#### Charge Distribution with Cylindrical Symmetry

A charge distribution has **cylindrical symmetry** if the charge density depends only upon the distance

from the axis of a cylinder and must not vary along the axis or with direction about the axis. In other words, if your system varies if you rotate it around the axis, or shift it along the axis, you do not have cylindrical symmetry.

Figure 2.3.7 shows four situations in which charges are distributed in a cylinder. A uniform charge density

. in an infinite straight wire has a cylindrical symmetry, and so does an infinitely long cylinder with constant charge density

. An infinitely long cylinder that has different charge densities along its length, such as a charge density

for

for

, does not have a usable cylindrical symmetry for this course. Neither does a cylinder in which charge density varies with the direction, such as a charge density

for

and

for

. A system with concentric cylindrical shells, each with uniform charge densities, albeit different in different shells, as in Figure 2.3.7(d), does have cylindrical symmetry if they are infinitely long. The infinite length requirement is due to the charge density changing along the axis of a finite cylinder. In real systems, we don’t have infinite cylinders; however, if the cylindrical object is considerably longer than the radius from it that we are interested in, then the approximation of an infinite cylinder becomes useful.

(Figure 2.3.7)

**Figure 2.3.7**To determine whether a given charge distribution has cylindrical symmetry, look at the cross-section of an “infinitely long” cylinder. If the charge density does not depend on the polar angle of the cross-section or along the axis, then you have cylindrical symmetry. (a) Charge density is constant in the cylinder; (b) upper half of the cylinder has a different charge density from the lower half; (c) left half of the cylinder has a different charge density from the right half; (d) charges are constant in different cylindrical rings, but the density does not depend on the polar angle. Cases (a) and (d) have cylindrical symmetry, whereas (b) and (c) do not.#### Consequences of symmetry

In all cylindrically symmetrical cases, the electric field

at any point

must also display cylindrical symmetry.

Cylindrical symmetry:

, where

is the distance from the axis and

is a unit vector directed perpendicularly away from the axis (Figure 2.3.8).