• Electromagnetics I
• Ch 1
• Loc 1.6

# Units

The term “unit” refers to the measure used to express a physical quantity. For example, the mean radius of the Earth is about 6,371,000 meters; in this case the unit is the meter.

A number like “6,371,000” becomes a bit cumbersome to write, so it is common to use a prefix to modify the unit. For example, the radius of the Earth is more commonly said to be 6371 kilometers, where one kilometer is understood to mean 1000 meters. It is common practice to use prefixes, such as “kilo-,” that yield values in the range 0.001 to 10, 000. A list of standard prefixes appears in Table 1.6.1.

PrefixMultiply by:Multiply by:
exa1018
peta1015
tera1012
giga109
mega106
kil103
milli10−3
micro10−6
nano10−9
pico10−12
femto10−15
atto10−18

Writing out the names of units can also become tedious. For this reason, it is common to use standard abbreviations; e.g., “6731 km” as opposed to “6371 kilometers,” where “k” is the standard abbreviation for the prefix “kilo” and “m” is the standard abbreviation for “meter.” A list of commonly-used base units and their abbreviations are shown in Table 1.6.2.

UnitAbbreviationQuantifies:
ampereelectric current
coulombelectric charge
henryinductance
hertzfrequency
jouleenergy
meterdistance
newtonforce
ohmresistance
secondtime
teslamagnetic flux density
voltelectric potential
wattpower
webermagnetic flux

To avoid ambiguity, it is important to always indicate the units of a quantity; e.g., writing “6371 km” as opposed to “6371.” Failure to do so is a common source of error and misunderstandings. An example is the expression:

where

is length and

is time. It could be that

is in meters and

is in seconds, in which case “3” really means “3 m/s”. However, if it is intended that

is in kilometers and

is in hours, then “3” really means “3 km/h” and the equation is literally different. To patch this up, one might write “

m/s”; however, note that this does does not resolve the ambiguity we just identified – i.e., we still don’t know the units of the constant “3.” Alternatively, one might write “

where

is in meters and

is in seconds,” which is unambiguous but becomes quite awkward for more complicated expressions. A better solution is to write instead:

or even better:

since this separates this issue of units from the perhaps more-important fact that l is proportional to t and the constant of proportionality (

) is known.

The meter is the fundamental unit of length in the International System of Units, known by its French acronym “SI” and sometimes informally referred to as the “metric system.”

In this work, we will use SI units exclusively.

Although SI is probably the most popular for engineering use overall, other systems remain in common use. For example, the English system, where the radius of the Earth might alternatively be said to be about 3959 miles, continues to be used in various applications and to a lesser or greater extent in various regions of the world. An alternative system in common use in physics and material science applications is the CGS (“centimeter-gram-second”) system. The CGS system is similar to SI, but with some significant differences. For example, the base unit of energy is the CGS system is not the “joule” but rather the “erg,” and the values of some physical constants become unitless. Therefore – once again – it is very important to include units whenever values are stated.

SI defines seven fundamental units from which all other units can be derived. These fundamental units are distance in meters (m), time in seconds (s), current in amperes (A), mass in kilograms (kg), temperature in kelvin (K), particle count in moles (mol), and luminosity in candela (cd). SI units for electromagnetic quantities such as coulombs (C) for charge and volts (V) for electric potential are derived from these fundamental units.

A frequently-overlooked feature of units is their ability to assist in error-checking mathematical expressions. For example, the electric field intensity may be specified in volts per meter (V/m), so an expression for the electric field intensity that yields units of V/m is said to be “dimensionally correct” (but not necessarily correct), whereas an expression that cannot be reduced to units of V/m cannot be correct.